deappleby.com

Stoneybrook's Home Page

Amenities

Announcements

Annual Report & Disclosures

Architectural Standards

Assessments

Building Permits

CAI

Calendar

CERT Training

Committees

Contacts

Events

FAQ for Occupancy Ledgers

Fence Project

Financials

Forms

Governing Documents

Insurance

Meetings

Minutes

Minutes Review

Newsletter

Parking Assignment

Photos

Plans Maps

Recent Sales

Rumors

SVOA Blog

Don's Home Page

 

Stoneybrook Villas Owners Assoc Unofficial Blog
A place for residents to express their views.
GET READY FOR MORE NEW FENCING
photo

Did you know the Board is about to authorize the new phase II fencing for in front of 412 and 436 at a cost of $48,000, after discussing it with those who wish to do so. The board also discussed painting the existing new phase I fence at past Board meetings, but the board authorized spending over $6,000 for painting the existing phase I fence a teal color green even though the majority of the owners clearly told the board they wanted the new fence painted black to match the rest of the old fence. 


The Board already has a bid from the original contractor who agreed to stand by his original bid even after steel price increases. Building 412 with the fence under the owner’s balconies is to cost $16,000 and the building 436 is to cost $32,000 for a total of $48,000. Please keep in mind that the original bid for the existing phase I new fence was $78,000, yet phase I ended up costing us in excess of $200,000 for a fence that did not even need to be replaced. 

 

Rich did a drawing of the proposed building 412 fencing,
which is to just plug the holes to the garage and plant roses to climb the pickets of the fencing.  Rich’s drawing is on Don Appleby’s Unofficial Stoneybrook Web Site. 

 

In the Architectural Committee meeting today Rich suggested
the Board could authorize the special assessment to be made in payments.  He thought there could be interest collected.


The phase III fence along the north half of Bellflower Boulevard is budgeted in the reserve study at a cost of $78,000 and phase IV fence (the church block wall) is budgeted for $240,000. 


According to the February 2008 Financial Statements the Fencing reserve account is already ($73,778.35) overdrawn. I know it doesn't make any difference to Rich whether the specific account has no money in it.

 

I had hoped that we were going to try not to spend any more
money unless it was absolutely necessary until we got out of our current financial crisis, which will be causing the problem of the inability to get financing for sales of units because our reserve percent funded will be ZERO during 2009 and 2010!


I just read an email from an owner who listed their unit for sale after learning the dues would be going up at the last board meeting for a third year in a row.  This owner was lucky to jump ship before it sinks.  This owner bailed out for $355,000 for a two bedroom.  This is about $100K less than the two bedrooms were selling for two years ago. How much more do you think our property values are going to decrease if we have three more 20% increases in dues in 2009, 2010 and 2011?


Hopefully the Board will decide the roofs ($1.2 million), waterproofing the deteriorating foundations ($2 million) and painting the buildings (.5 million) are the top priorities. 


We currently have about $1.5 million in cash in the reserve account.  If the Board will stop spending any money on reserve items except for emergencies and replacing something that breaks, then in two years we will have built up the reserves $1.8 million from the dues plus the current $1.5 million in cash for a total of $3.2 million, which will cover replacing all three top priorities with a special assessment of $1.2 for the roofs.  If the board continues to spend money on reserve items other than the top three priorities, then we are going to have to postpone dealing with the roofs, waterproofing and painting the buildings.


By Bill Whitecloud

April 2, 2008

bwhitecloud@verizon.net

2008-04-04 02:21:42 GMT
Comments (1 total)
Author:Anonymous
The previous Board of Directors already wasted over $200,000 of our money replacing phase I of Richard Jark’s new fence fiasco, which replaced our old black fence that did not need to be replaced. At the March 19, 2008 Board Meeting the BOD approved $6,200 to paint phase I fencing (existing new galvanized fence) teal green, which will not even match the rest of the older black fence.

We have already had three increases in our HOA dues for three years in a row and the Board of Directors is considering asking the owners for a $1,200,000 special assessment to replace the roofs. If the owners do not approve this special assessment, then it is predicted that we will have 3 more 20% increases in our dues for the next 3 years in a row. The average dues will be close to $600 per month.

It is insane to think the Board is considering going ahead with Phase II of the fence project replacing the fence along the sidewalk at the south half of Bellflower Boulevard at a cost of $48,000. The original bid for phase I was $78,000, which ended up costing over $200,000.

Richard Jark’s sales pitch for his new fence is that we will be more secure. Harry Erickson, Long Beach Police Department Crime Prevention Unit, states “It is my opinion that removing the fence in question will create additional problems at Stony brook and not solve any existing issues”. The following is an email message from Corporal Erickson concerning the purposed phase II of the fence project.

From: Harry_Erickson@longbeach.gov
Sent: Wednesday, October 04, 2006 11:27 AM
To: pwhitecloud@verizon.net
Subject: Fencing at Stonybrook

After inspecting the location and discussing the proposal to remove the fence along Bellflower BI with Mary Thomas, Ward and the others, I have the following to report to you.

* By removing the existing fence, I anticipate that you will experience the following:
* Increased incidence of trespassing into the landscaped areas.
* Homeless sleeping and storing belongings in the landscaped areas.
* People using the landscaped area for a restroom.
* Increase in people walking dogs and allowing them to defecate and urinate in the landscaped areas.
*Reduced security and increased access to the ground-level balconies.
* Accumulation of trash and debris In the landscaped areas.

Keep in mind that fencing typically does not prevent unauthorized entry into communities such as Stonybrook. A higher fence does not usually solve the problems of people coming Into the property uninvited. Unauthorized access in usually gained by someone following a vehicle into the garage or by following a person into the complex through another entrance.

The existing fencing will discourage some "opportunistic" trespassers and reduce the problems mentioned above. The new fence will not totally prevent someone from entering if they really want to, as they will find easier ways to enter as mentioned above.

It is my opinion that removing the fence in question will create additional problems at Stonybrook and not solve any existing issues.

Please call me if you have any further questions.

Harry Erickson, Corporal
Long Beach Police Department Crime Prevention Unit
(562) 570-7448


--Sponser of Fixing of Priorities
2008-04-04 12:46:23 GMT
Compose a comment for this post.
Comment:
0 characters left (limit 4,000 characters). No HTML permitted.
Word verification:
To validate this comment, showing us that you are human, and not a computer, please retype the following code in the field provided.
(This helps prevent blog spam.)
Add to My Yahoo! RSS